Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
sTRX4, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 56.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 294
87% 168 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,113
101% 848 Pts
64-Core 5,668
351% 5,668 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 4200 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 234
Reflection 228
Parallax 251
190% 238 fps
Gravity 237
Splatting 191
186% 214 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 26 110 52 14 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 341
Write 307
Mixed 241
SusWrite 52.8
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 13.9
57% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 81.1
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 11.8
18% 35 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 58%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$145
212GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 196 196 197 196 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 373
Write 363
Mixed 333
SusWrite 192
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 43.7
144% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 194
148% 201 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 125%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
272GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1486 744 749 748 752 788 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 3184
Mixed 2,220
SusWrite 878
471% 2,087 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 69.3
237% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,432
DQ Write 1,237
DQ Mixed 1,329
998% 1333 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 269%
Great: 500%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
466GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 202 201 202 202 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 377
Write 376
Mixed 341
SusWrite 196
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 47.8
160% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 175
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
568GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 110
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 138 139 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 159
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 136
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 96 96 92 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 90.6
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 94.8
116% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 42%
H/W DISK 1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 81 82 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 185
Write 165
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 72.7
150% 121 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
H/W DISK 2 6TB
198GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 26 27 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 100
Write 81.4
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 24.4
80% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
103% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 71%
H/W DISK 3 6TB
853GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 27 27 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 192
Write 184
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 24.4
142% 117 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 63%
H/W DISK 4 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 27 27 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 111
Write 103
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 24.5
87% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
570GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 108
Mixed 39.5
111% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
200% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 68%
ST330006 51AS 3TB
440GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.1
Write 85.7
Mixed 62.2
97% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 56%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 36.7
108% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 0.7
466% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
478% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3000C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 7R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 17% 103 109 6 60 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM772B LG HDR WQHD
Typical ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $3,258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback