PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Eurocom Tornado F5 (all builds) |
Motherboard | EUROCOM Tornado F5 |
Memory | 26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170310 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '21 at 09:16 |
Run Duration | 332 Seconds |
Run User | ISR-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
87.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M3000M
MSI(1462 1195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 659 658 660 656 658 MB/s
|
272%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
189GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 316 317 318 316 316 MB/s
|
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 124GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 161 160 147 154 151 MB/s
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 100 106 102 MB/s
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
53GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.6 1.2 5.7 1.4 5.8 MB/s
|
1.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G HX424S15IB2/8-SP KHX2400C14S4/8G HX424S15IB2/8-SP 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45% | 17% | 63 | 307 | 220 | 60 | 15.5" | 1536 864 | SDC424B |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 9x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 1x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples | 3x |
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples | 3x |
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $273 |