Lenovo 81BN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81BN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration601 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 90.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 139
69% 111 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 139
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.1 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 49 90 94 89 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75
Write 111
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 73.6
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4H8GS26A8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 6R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 32% 37 81 64 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN14D6
History: Score 22: 2R 3G 3B | Score 21: 4R 0G 1B | Score 33: 4R 4G 1B | Score 37: 5R 4G 0B | Score 28: 5R 1G 0B | Score 24: 3R 3G 0B | Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 27: 5R 0G 2B | Score 31: 4R 2G 5B | Score 40: 6R 2G 4B
Typical 81BN Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81BN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback