Lenovo 81D5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81D5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 84.8
35% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 37.5
8-Core 64.7
6% 51.1 Pts
64-Core 60.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F3) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 5.75
3% 5.43 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 29 30 21 31 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 27.5
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.7 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 7.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.5
12% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.4
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4H8GS26A8 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81D5 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback