Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 751
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002P1LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1154 828 711 623 505 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 322
Write 53.9
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 848
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 52.5
108% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 489
370% 498 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 124%
Great: 251%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
57GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 33.8
Write 32.4
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 10.8
35% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 5.7
550% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 8.6
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 5.5
566% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 111%
Netac OnlyDisk 269GB
226GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 10 10 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 31.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 10.6
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
176% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 206 203 203 202 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 135
SusWrite 202
249% 184 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.3
358% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 3.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
184% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 28.8" 1280 720 DEL408B DELL U2913WM
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback