Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 70.2
34% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 227
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.4
8% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TB
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002P1LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 984 1086 1015 1080 1069 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 809
Mixed 830
SusWrite 1,049
189% 830 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 134
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 124%
Great: 251%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
57GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 34.4
Write 33.8
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 10.6
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 4.9
463% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 7.3
623% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 111%
Netac OnlyDisk 269GB
226GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 34.4
Mixed 37
SusWrite 21.3
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
169% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 204 202 199 203 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 201
Write 198
Mixed 137
SusWrite 201
249% 184 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.8
232% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 20.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 28.8" 1280 720 DEL408B DELL U2913WM
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback