Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 64%
CPU Throttled 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 70.3
34% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 212
20% 164 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.7
8% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002P1LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 990 1073 1073 1034 1081 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 792
Mixed 807
SusWrite 1,053
210% 936 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 132
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 141%
Great: 251%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
57GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 37.2
Write 36.2
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 22.8
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 4.8
494% 6.8 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 6.7
616% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 111%
Netac OnlyDisk 269GB
226GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 10 9.9 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 31.3
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 10.3
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.8
170% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 204 202 202 200 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 200
Write 198
Mixed 134
SusWrite 201
247% 183 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.7
224% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 20.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 28.8" 1280 720 DEL408B DELL U2913WM
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback