MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 21:55
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 156
2-Core 301
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 884
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Sapphire(1DA2 E423) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 93.3
62% 79.3 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 43
46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 339 347 351 353 352 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 319
Write 338
Mixed 296
SusWrite 348
74% 325 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 31.1
117% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 136
117% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
231GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2059 2062 2068 2068 2070 2026 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,690
Write 2,088
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 2,059
468% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 77.7
258% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,347
DQ Write 1,133
DQ Mixed 1258
938% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 369%
Great: 393%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 59 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 58.1
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
698GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 118
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R009R432GX2-3200C16A 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.8
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 30.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77%
Great: 175%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback