To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration	1031 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 669 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 136 59% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 429 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 52.5 Parallax 34.1 29% 40.8 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 31.8 Splatting 30 26% 32 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201219 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 346 340 337 123 9 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 448 Write 354 Mixed 333 SusWrite 241 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 11.4 101% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 20.3 67% 141 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 166%
NE-128 128GB 3,172 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 33GB free Firmware: T0707A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 141 130 73 52 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 886 Write 500 Mixed 495 SusWrite 144 112% 506 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 20.2 135% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 377 DQ Mixed 224 188% 266 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 173%
Jmicron Generic 128GB 413 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 24 20 22 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.7% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 33.5 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 22.5 7% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 8 30% 9.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 9.8 9% 13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 615GB free Firmware: AX0R2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 66 66 66 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 100 Write 102 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 65.2 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 62%
SD Card Reader 134GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 97GB free, PID 2731 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	Read 6 Write 6 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 21.7 15% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 2.4 302% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 25%
SMI USB DISK 64GB 1,634 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 58GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 5.2 5.6 12 5.1 9.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 7.7 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 6.7 22% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 70% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 18 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 3R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	25%	20	335	271	60	72.3"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV SSCR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	714x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	280x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	617x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	302x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16