To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 17:48
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 134
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 403
40% 328 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 52
Parallax 37.7
29% 41.7 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 30.3
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 327 230 9.9 10 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 468
Write 355
Mixed 345
SusWrite 154
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 11.4
100% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 20.1
65% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 166%
NE-128 128GB
20GB free
Firmware: T0707A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 896
Write 505
Mixed 494
139% 632 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 17
127% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 223
183% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 173%
Jmicron Generic 128GB
21GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 127 67 55 55 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 305
Write 276
Mixed 261
SusWrite 107
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 11.7
69% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 120
95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
229GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 68.7
Write 68
Mixed 29
SusWrite 105
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback