Lenovo 90AV001NFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90AV001NFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 21:41
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 343
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 105
Parallax 64.2
53% 78.1 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 56.1
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 110 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 79.2
Write 139
Mixed 121
SusWrite 104
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 23.1
93% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 118
93% 127 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 80GB-$33
11GB free
Firmware: A63A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 32.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 28.4
19% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 75 23.8" 1280 720 ACR073C KA242Y
Typical 90AV001NFR Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90AV001NFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback