Lenovo 90AV001NFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90AV001NFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 370
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 102
Parallax 70
52% 78.8 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 54.6
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 82 103 101 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 80.5
Write 167
Mixed 144
SusWrite 98.2
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 116
97% 139 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 80GB-$33
11GB free
Firmware: A63A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.9
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 4R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 56% 16 314 250 75 23.8" 1920 1080 ACR073C KA242Y
Typical 90AV001NFR Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90AV001NFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback