Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '21 at 11:08
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 189 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 633 59% 493 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 142 Parallax 142 116% 142 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 132 Splatting 116 105% 130 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 552GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1541 1578 1633 1534 1467 1436 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,419 Write 2,290 Mixed 1,765 SusWrite 1,532 449% 2,001 MB/s	4K Read 53.4 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 68.8 227% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 736 DQ Write 479 DQ Mixed 504 404% 573 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 410%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 46GB free Firmware: 2.11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 59 59 58 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 183 Write 62.6 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 59.1 22% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 26.3 104% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 79.7 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 71.6 54% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 51%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 74GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 240 207 225 256 276 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 462 Write 142 Mixed 221 SusWrite 237 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 23.2 92% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 129 108% 162 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 76%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 132GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 407 406 409 408 409 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 487 Write 286 Mixed 310 SusWrite 407 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 26.8 101% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 159 128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 86%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 119GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 407 408 406 405 404 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 489 Write 244 Mixed 293 SusWrite 405 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 27 101% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 156 126% 184 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 86%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 53GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,910 Write 1,270 Mixed 546 272% 1,242 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 37.8 162% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 794 DQ Write 474 DQ Mixed 683 496% 650 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 152 150 152 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 152 Write 109 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 150 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 361GB free Firmware: CR100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 73 72 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 61.5 Write 76 Mixed 44 SusWrite 71.1 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 44GB free Firmware: CR100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 58 59 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 47.7 Write 58.6 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 58.1 37% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.M8FB1 2x16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 34.5 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 30.7 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27G2G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)