Thunderobot Dino

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Thunderobot Dino (all builds)
Motherboard	THUNDEROBOT NL5
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 190 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 554 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Quanta(152D 1154) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.7% Average	Lighting 58 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 60.6 47% 62.8 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 62.5 52% 63.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT2100Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 497 Write 337 Mixed 321 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 49.3 164% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 330 256% 350 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 176GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 77 77 76 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 70.7 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 74.5 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 71%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.3 6.6 6.1 6.3 6.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	5.85% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 3.5 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 6.2 8% 7.15 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.85% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 2x8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 21.5 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 5R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	25%	28	311	222	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUO42ED

History: Score 17: 1R 3G 3B | Score 29: 5R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Dino Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Thunderobot Dino

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	4x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	2x

SSD
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	2x

RAM
AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 2x8GBAdataBench 72%, 51 samples	3x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	2x
AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 1x8GBAdataBench 39%, 95 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16