Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics222% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive461% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,132
107% 887 Pts
64-Core 1,568
97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
222% Outstanding
Lighting 339
Reflection 279
Parallax 357
276% 325 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 252
Splatting 179
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 222%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3974 3975 3978 1341 706 699 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 3,159
Write 3,239
Mixed 2,863
SusWrite 2,446
659% 2,927 MB/s
4K Read 81.9
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 107
392% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,604
DQ Write 1,322
DQ Mixed 1,495
1,111% 1,474 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 461%
Great: 494%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
303GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 499 499 499 499 499 499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 497
Mixed 472
SusWrite 499
112% 497 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 63.9
222% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 499 498 499 499 499 499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 497
Mixed 411
SusWrite 499
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 66.8
230% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
428GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 86.6
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 90.2
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
876GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 113 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 112
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 45.7
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 46.4
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback