Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 233%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics221% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive465% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 18:39
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,135
107% 888 Pts
64-Core 1,573
97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Lighting 337
Reflection 279
Parallax 355
275% 324 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 252
Splatting 179
205% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 221%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3952 3949 3949 1418 698 734 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
465% Outstanding
Read 3,216
Write 3,519
Mixed 2,892
SusWrite 2,450
680% 3,019 MB/s
4K Read 82
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 107
393% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,609
DQ Write 1350
DQ Mixed 1490
1,113% 1,483 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 465%
Great: 494%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
303GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 499 499 499 499 499 498 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 498
Mixed 475
SusWrite 499
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.4
222% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 498 499 499 499 498 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 495
Mixed 411
SusWrite 498
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 66.1
229% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
428GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 90.2
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
876GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 78.7
Write 64.4
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 82.3
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 45.9
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 36.4
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 46.4
108% 37.7 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback