MSI 870A-G54 (FX)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (FX)  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 98
47% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 189
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 61
48% 62.4 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 53.6
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 295 309 320 324 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 389
Write 341
Mixed 295
SusWrite 293
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 56.7
46% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
24GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.1 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 15.5
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 9.6
20% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.5
182% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-006.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 16% 103 269 152 60 22" 1680 1050 DEL403C DELL 2208WFP
History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 38: 4R 3G 9B
Typical 870A-G54 (FX) Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (FX)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback