Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive365% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,131
101% 856 Pts
64-Core 2,169
134% 2,169 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 86
74% 89.5 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 84.4
71% 86.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2543 2703 2983 2771 1446 1440 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,852
SusWrite 2,314
475% 2,098 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 93.1
304% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 1,170
881% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 365%
Great: 444%
e-star 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: E7FI04.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 1083 876 1147 934 1124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 915
Write 801
Mixed 613
SusWrite 1,032
189% 840 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 40.2
149% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 605
510% 741 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 181%
Great: 240%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
692GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 125 121 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 120
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 38.2
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 31.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 6R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 12% 83 108 6 60 29" 2560 1080 GSM5AE4 LG ULTRAWIDE
History: Score 29: 4R 2G 3B | Score 40: 6R 3G 1B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback