HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 04:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 131
51% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 296
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
e-star 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 236 287 282 329 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 101
Mixed 147
SusWrite 290
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 8.2
44% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 96.6
107% 180 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.2% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 14" 1280 720 LGD0599
Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 3,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback