Acer Veriton X2611G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton X2611G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X2611G
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 06:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 161
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 238
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Acer(1025 0492) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 207 208 202 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 218
Write 203
Mixed 197
SusWrite 190
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 1
53% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 15.7
17% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 99U5458-005.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 ACR00F9 V193HQ
Typical Veriton X2611G Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X2611G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback