MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 22:24
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 790
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1215) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 151
Parallax 86.3
71% 108 fps
MRender 90.3
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 105
81% 97.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 296 326 257 244 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 655
Write 644
Mixed 557
SusWrite 287
120% 536 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.1
189% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 725
567% 782 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 139%
Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
504GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 55 54 56 53 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 165
Write 113
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 55.7
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FH 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 9R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 14% 65 8 6 240 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
History: Score 44: 6R 3G 5B | Score 45: 9R 0G 0B
Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback