Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 590
55% 457 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 72.3
23% 53.4 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 56
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 372 315 350 313 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 450
Write 414
Mixed 200
SusWrite 319
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 25.9
94% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 128
132% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid Force MP510 240GB
202GB free
Firmware: ECFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 735 1074 600 327 359 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1277
Write 1,176
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 576
227% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 30.9
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 359
265% 341 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 134%
Great: 154%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 6RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 148 126 139 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 451
Write 152
Mixed 177
SusWrite 138
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 25.6
95% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 116
115% 188 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 81%
Amd-raid Force MP510 480GB
210GB free
Firmware: ECFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1467 541 466 465 467 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 793
Write 1724
Mixed 923
SusWrite 645
232% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 29
93% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 347
247% 304 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 113%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback