Lenovo 11361N9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 11361N9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 02:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 136
48% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 533
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.28
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.3
33% 39 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 38.9
34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 405 410 400 364 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 389
Mixed 376
SusWrite 393
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 44.8
144% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 297
240% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
168GB free
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 162 169 172 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 326
Write 216
Mixed 229
SusWrite 170
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 32.7
127% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 217
172% 241 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 48
137% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.7
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback