Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 15:44
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 611
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 72.3
45% 62.7 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 55.8
52% 65 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 379 398 358 392 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 455
Write 423
Mixed 222
SusWrite 376
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 24.4
90% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 129
133% 220 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid Force MP510 240GB
202GB free
Firmware: ECFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1114 361 361 361 360 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 956
Mixed 1,025
SusWrite 587
200% 888 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 31.8
107% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 357
266% 344 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 124%
Great: 154%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 6RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 154 154 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 457
Write 150
Mixed 179
SusWrite 151
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 25.9
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 119
116% 188 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 81%
Amd-raid Force MP510 480GB
210GB free
Firmware: ECFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 478 454 453 453 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 671
Write 467
Mixed 446
SusWrite 557
120% 535 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 20.5
77% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 350
244% 293 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 7R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 24% 54 304 224 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H
History: Score 31: 2R 7G 0B | Score 53: 7R 6G 0B
Typical X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback