MSI MS-16P6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16P6  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 05:29
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 555
62% 488 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1219) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 7.6
5% 18.6 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.4
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 58 6.1 27 46 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 148
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 42.4
16% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 21.2
89% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 60.2
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 155
97% 107 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 77%
Jingyi HS 512G SSD 512GB
113GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 396 392 383 223 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
Read 480
Write 397
Mixed 341
SusWrite 304
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 10.7
89% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 16
68% 148 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 30% 10 280 192 60 27" 1920 1080 AUS2401 VG249Q1R
History: Score 25: 3R 2G 4B | Score 11: 1R 2G 0B
Typical MS-16P6 Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback