Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 329
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,052
100% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,564
97% 1,564 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4800 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 59.6
49% 59.6 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.5
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
259GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,896
Write 1462
Mixed 698
298% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 56.4
203% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 1,338
DQ Mixed 996
810% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
558GB free
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 854
Write 892
Mixed 708
183% 818 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 42.1
152% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 240
203% 290 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 411%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3485
Write 4,407
Mixed 3,094
821% 3,662 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 89
317% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 1,381
DQ Mixed 94.6
432% 972 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 884
Write 874
Mixed 646
179% 801 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 29.3
125% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 260
209% 286 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 429%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
127GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 238
Write 185
Mixed 197
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 40.5
135% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 119
93% 129 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
HPT DISK 0_7 2TB
465GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.6
Write 94.4
Mixed 51.7
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
218GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.3
Write 89.5
Mixed 46.4
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.6
Write 74.5
Mixed 66.3
54% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
464GB free
Firmware: MJAO
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 119
Mixed 42
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
297GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 132
Mixed 69.8
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
258GB free
Firmware: JKAO
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78
Write 81.1
Mixed 41.7
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
21GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 117
Mixed 50.2
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
248GB free
Firmware: JKAO
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 56.8
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
Seagate ST4000VN000-1H41 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 158
Mixed 66.7
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
290GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.6
Write 78.9
Mixed 44.2
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
460GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.6
Write 85.3
Mixed 54.2
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.2
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 34.9
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27B1 ROG PG278Q
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback