MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime40.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 631
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 106
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 93.2
86% 98.2 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 69.8
67% 84.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,286
Write 1,320
Mixed 1203
284% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.4
221% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 763
604% 839 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 21.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback