MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 14:57
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 637
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 110
Parallax 102
89% 107 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 85
Splatting 72.5
71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 1116 1149 1048 470 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1298
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 851
256% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 57.8
184% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 916
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 725
549% 745 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 194%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback