Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170828
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 02:32
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
100% 180 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 869
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 142
Splatting 127
110% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,720
Write 210
Mixed 414
167% 781 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 59.2
226% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 510
452% 708 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
27GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 196 188 188 188 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69% Good
Read 463
Write 191
Mixed 225
SusWrite 188
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 14.7
116% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 28.5
49% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Synology iSCSI Storage 161GB
24GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 78.7
Write 98.9
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 73.2
18% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 12.9
48% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 68.3
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 106
75% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 29%
Synology iSCSI Storage 183GB
28GB free
Firmware: 3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 37 38 37 38 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 79
Write 70.8
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 37.8
15% 67 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 3.2
26% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 37.4
24% 27.5 MB/s
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
39GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 86 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 84.7
Write 85.1
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 87.8
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
39GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 82 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 80.8
71% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28.9
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 34
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 7R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 76% 25 157 124 144 27" 2560 1440 DELA0D1 Dell S2716DG
History: Score 37: 4R 3G 8B | Score 59: 7R 6G 6B
Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback