Lenovo 20EQS48H00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS48H00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS48H00
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 213
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 548
60% 476 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 6.8
5% 10.2 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1761 942 624 619 628 625 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,337
Write 2,149
Mixed 986
SusWrite 867
353% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 86.7
291% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 892
651% 857 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 274%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
108GB free
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 223 63 63 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 438
Write 294
Mixed 267
SusWrite 129
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 35.2
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 120
98% 140 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
134GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 217 218 218 219 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 913
Mixed 879
SusWrite 261
192% 863 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 73.2
262% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 576
455% 631 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 182%
Great: 199%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
45GB free, PID 1000, Samsung Bar 64GB
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 33.4
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 34.2
91% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 3.7
785% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 4.5
822% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS7AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD HMA41GS7AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.6" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20EQS48H00 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EQS48H00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback