Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 276
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 847
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 1072
66% 1072 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 9
5% 8.47 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 148
10% 61.7 fps
Gravity 127
Splatting 83.9
90% 105 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2394
Write 1,475
Mixed 1,168
370% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 93.9
331% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 1,010
752% 993 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
91GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 896 892 868 805 768 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 865
Mixed 737
SusWrite 854
248% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 59
248% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 374
357% 581 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 239%
Great: 243%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,436
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,122
369% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 94.2
338% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,010
770% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
638GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 452 458 475 482 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 465
Mixed 410
SusWrite 465
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 57.7
190% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
551GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 87 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 98.2
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 88.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
202% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 171 170 171 170 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 76.8
Write 133
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 166
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 85%
Lacie USB 3.0 Drive 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 105 110 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 107
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 109
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$62
777GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 106 106 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 66
SusWrite 105
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 2.7 3.5 3.2 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 4.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.5
7% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 28.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 27
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $888
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback