Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory39.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 470
63% 469 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 40.6
32% 40.7 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 46.1
42% 52.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1425 1499 1532 1610 1627 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,941
Write 1,637
Mixed 940
SusWrite 1,454
334% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 47.4
176% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 396
352% 547 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 248%
Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
83GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,912
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,077
363% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 64.3
212% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 796
593% 793 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
137GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 275 273 274 276 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 325
Write 318
Mixed 302
SusWrite 272
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 23.5
81% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 86.6
70% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 118%
Thnsn525 6GPU7 NVMe T 256GB
228GB free
Firmware: 8206 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.2% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 34.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 35.1
8% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 16.6
13% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 132%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 109 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 65.3
Write 74.2
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 109
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 80AD000080AD HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7950 BenQ EW3270U
Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback