Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 08:31
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 88.8 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 974 92% 765 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72% Very good	Lighting 90.7 Reflection 125 Parallax 82.8 74% 99.6 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 70.8 68% 85.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 70 79 68 6.5 55 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 413 Write 261 Mixed 225 SusWrite 73 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 19.3 66% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 56.4 DQ Mixed 38.2 39% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 118 117 117 117 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 110 Write 132 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 115 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB 3,511 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 22.6 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 24.2 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,074x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	933x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	297x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	232x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	301x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	159x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16