HP Pro 3505 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3505 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 15:34
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 37
2-Core 75.2
37% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 74.6
10% 73.2 Pts
64-Core 74.4
5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370D
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 235 207 230 229 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 257
Write 237
Mixed 224
SusWrite 226
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 141
113% 158 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 118%
Jmicron Tech 128GB
113GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 34.9
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 37
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 6.3
1,108% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 2 60 19" 1280 720 IVM46E3 PLP1704
Typical Pro 3505 Series Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3505 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback