Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 167
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 370
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 30.9
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 32 33 32 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 76%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
1GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 417
Mixed 407
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 36.2
122% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 254
219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 429GB
400GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 37.5
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 17.4
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 86%
WDC WD10 JPVX-60JC3T1 1TB
173GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 35.8
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 17.5
35% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 23.6" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix G241VC
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback