Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171123
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 02:16
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 176
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 417
54% 405 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3615) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 42.2
26% 35.7 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 34.2
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 52 47 52 47 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 414
Write 310
Mixed 264
SusWrite 56
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 8.3
53% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 30.4
38% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
445GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 71 71 69 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 63
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 69.9
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
720GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 120 119 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
845GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 125 124 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 123
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 68%
UNITEK 1TB
504GB free
Firmware: 2201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 89 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49% Average
Read 86
Write 13.2
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 84.6
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 5R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 36% 47 238 121 60 23" 1920 1080 HWP2909 HP 2310e
History: Score 43: 7R 1G 5B | Score 51: 5R 7G 5B
Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback