Lenovo 36805V8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 44% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 36805V8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36805V8
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 30
2-Core 55.9
33% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 73.4
8-Core 73.8
10% 73.6 Pts
64-Core 74
5% 74 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0316
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 199 201 123 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 218
Write 198
Mixed 189
SusWrite 160
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 16.7
58% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 122
96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 102%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
244GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 19
Write 12
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 18.9
22% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EF48E8W1333 80CE M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GB
1334, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.8
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback