Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 85.3 42% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 129 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21C1) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.72 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 1.09 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MMCQE28G8MUP-0VA 128GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM08L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 38 46 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 79.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 36.6 8% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 4.7 19% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3020EF48E8W1333 80CE M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1334, 1066 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16