Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 23:11
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 123
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 376
36% 298 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.5% Good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 87
Parallax 76.2
75% 85.1 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 71
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 44 29 33 35 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70% Good
Read 355
Write 111
Mixed 297
SusWrite 57.2
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 43
140% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 212
153% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
77GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 314 282 248 283 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 438
Mixed 433
SusWrite 288
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 44.8
148% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 7.9
76% 178 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
90GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 58.9
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 67.7
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 8R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 57% 35 104 6 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0B43 S24D300
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback