Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$75
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 59
2-Core 114
54% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 314
31% 255 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.4% Good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 87
Parallax 75.6
74% 84.4 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 69.7
58% 71 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 189 111 69 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 353
Write 168
Mixed 295
SusWrite 109
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 42.4
136% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 209
150% 194 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
77GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 316 316 283 297 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 396
Mixed 416
SusWrite 295
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 43.9
143% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 21.5
81% 181 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
90GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 58.8
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 67.5
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 6R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 41% 22 99 5 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0B43 S24D300
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback