Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$75
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 121
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 353
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.1% Good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 75.7
74% 84.4 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 70.6
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 70 31 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 354
Write 186
Mixed 300
SusWrite 59.9
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 42.4
137% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 214
154% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
77GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 341 298 299 313 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 422
Mixed 400
SusWrite 302
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 48.6
94% 190 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
90GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 63.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 71.3
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 20% 64 166 47 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0B43 S24D300
History: Score 48: 7R 4G 1B | Score 39: 4R 5G 4B
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback