HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84DB
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 160 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 375 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 29.4 8% 19.3 fps	MRender 30.1 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 10.4 15% 20 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,006 Write 855 Mixed 619 184% 827 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 37.2 110% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 549 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 524 378% 490 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 130GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 68 66 67 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 92.2 Write 84.3 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 66.8 49% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C4FE Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 4R 6G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	43%	47	107	31	144	15.5"	1920 1080	LGD05C0

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,787x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	943x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1,166x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	521x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	334x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	234x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmv128gBench 91%, 3,266 samples	214x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	313x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	304x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	265x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16