Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 04:08
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 141
58% 97 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 345
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.62% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 7.8
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 322 307 300 304 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 318
Write 293
Mixed 272
SusWrite 312
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 30.5
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 43.9
39% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 140 130 128 128 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 131
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 7R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 9% 146 163 118 60 17.2" 1366 768 AUO159D
History: Score 17: 1R 4G 0B | Score 51: 7R 5G 1B
Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback