Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 07:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 41.7
27% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 138
12% 102 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 7.9
7% 9.63 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 221 232 232 238 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 261
Write 241
Mixed 229
SusWrite 230
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 53.9
DQ Mixed 36.3
29% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 132 128 128 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 108
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 131
71% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback