Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 11:30
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 21
2-Core 41.9
28% 39 Pts
4-Core 73.1
8-Core 126
12% 99.3 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 7.9
7% 9.67 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 233 230 235 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 254
Write 236
Mixed 219
SusWrite 233
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 15
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 54.8
DQ Mixed 36.3
29% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
543GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 142 145 145 141 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 140
Write 104
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 142
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback