Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 941
93% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,455
90% 1,455 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1097 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 118
72% 92.6 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 44.2
52% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,553
Write 2327
Mixed 1,551
476% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 90.6
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1,222
918% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
34GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 205 205 202 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 467
Write 202
Mixed 205
SusWrite 205
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 14.6
102% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 75.6
88% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 78%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
20GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 256 243 125 89 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 483
Write 255
Mixed 252
SusWrite 172
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 15.5
98% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 16.2
40% 83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
36GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 86 95 116 112 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 108
SusWrite 102
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
379% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
126GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 113 131 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 90.8
Write 128
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 124
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
345% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6GB free
Firmware: 040B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 117
Mixed 85.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
221% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 34 40 36 33 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 38.9
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 38.1
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
51GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 57.1
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 57.3
39% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
1GB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.9
Write 54.4
Mixed 45.9
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
56GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 83 79 80 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 90.1
Write 84.7
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 82.4
108% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.1
337% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 39.7
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 37.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 25.6" 1280 720 HWP26F9 HP LP2475w
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback