Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '17 at 18:56
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 84.7 38% 61.4 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 334 30% 252 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA); 1080 ti strix CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2890 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.6% Outstanding	Lighting 93 Reflection 112 Parallax 205 76% 137 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 193 Splatting 134 125% 155 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 45331039 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 31533649888660 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 326 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 56 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 40 55837196327 (C2) HDA temperature 39 40 55837196327 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 45331039 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 45331039 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 45331039 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1088 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1137 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1137 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1556	56% Above average	Read 477 Write 243 Mixed 296 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 10 71% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 9.81 16% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 753GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 64 130379234 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 77 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1236727 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 63 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 60 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 639107110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 77 (C2) HDA temperature 38 21 90194313254 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 6 1 130379234 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -416611827652 (F1) Unknown 100 253 992396147 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1321079386	103% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 176 Mixed 157 129% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.29 98% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA MK5075GSX 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 154GB free, PID 022e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 58.7 Write 53 Mixed 52 69% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.25 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 30.2 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 19.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)