Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 149 57% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 582 52% 441 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 3416) CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 79 49% 65.7 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 43.3 43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB 5,700 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0807A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 30 62 34 54 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 457 Write 327 Mixed 27 SusWrite 49.9 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 0.4 49% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 88.9 DQ Mixed 49.8 53% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 790GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 132 148 157 155 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 180 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 150 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH64AA#ABB 2x8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 34.1 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 19.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	4	2	60	21.5"	1280 720	VSC6F2E VA2246 SERIES

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	284x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	226x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16