TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10SJ0006AU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10SJ0006AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3132
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 23:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 241
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 844
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 89.7%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3132) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.47 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.24%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,832
Write 735
Mixed 933
255% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 73.4
245% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 908
666% 876 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 247%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
464GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 120
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 128
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 75.6%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 77%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC156 PHL 273V7
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback