Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 01:17
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 335
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,206
111% 926 Pts
64-Core 2,291
142% 2,291 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 117
Parallax 132
102% 125 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 123
Splatting 107
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2209 2243 2232 2265 2036 1757 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 2,346
Mixed 1,948
SusWrite 2,124
464% 2045 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 91.6
310% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1372
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,268
951% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 353%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
211GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 461 455 457 445 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 454
Mixed 445
SusWrite 429
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
3TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 211 217 219 218 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 226 229 228 233 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 139%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
114GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 93 94 87 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 171
Write 90.5
Mixed 88
SusWrite 90.4
136% 110 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.1
270% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB
2GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 4.4 5.3 6.2 5 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
9.82% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 1.8
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 5.8
9% 9.17 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
146% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 45
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 45.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 35% 34 343 281 60 27" 2194 1234 AOC2790 U2790B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback